04-24-2018, 11:29 AM
(04-24-2018, 09:48 AM)irukandji Wrote:Quote:Nick made the rigth decision choosing his to protect his unborn son over Juluette as inncoent children's lives should always come first. I would have also expected Nick to protect Adalinds child even if it wasnt his, he couldn't just stand by and risk Juliette hurting an innocent child in its mothers womb, if he had of just stood by or took Juliettes side and helped her hurt a pregnant woman I would have lost all respect for Nick as a morale Character.
I don’t see how you can criticize Nick for supposedly choosing Adalind over Juliette even though he clearly didn’t he was just saving an innocent child, also Juliette had a one night stand with the man who brougth Adalind into thier lives in the first place sean Renard, so its a bit hypocritical to claim only Adalind ruined their lives when Renard started the whole mess in the first place that eventually led to all the things that happened to Juliette. Juliette had no problem sharing Renards bed, yet Nick is supposedly committing a terrible crime against her for simply stoping her from killing his child in Adalinds womb.
Nick never felt Adalind was in such grave danger. If he did, he would never have taken Juliette on by himself. As syscrash pointed out, Juliette could easily have thrown him aside and gotten to Adalind regardless. *IF* she so desired.
Nick *never* considered the situation grave, or he would have told Wu to call for backup and then had Wu assist him.
(04-24-2018, 07:49 AM)Henry of green Wrote: Nick made the rigth decision choosing his to protect his unborn son over Juluette as inncoent children's lives should always come first. I would have also expected Nick to protect Adalinds child even if it wasnt his, he couldn't just stand by and risk Juliette hurting an innocent child in its mothers womb, if he had of just stood by or took Juliettes side and helped her hurt a pregnant woman I would have lost all respect for Nick as a morale Character.
I don’t see how you can criticize Nick for supposedly choosing Adalind over Juliette even though he clearly didn’t he was just saving an innocent child, also Juliette had a one night stand with the man who brougth Adalind into thier lives in the first place sean Renard, so its a bit hypocritical to claim only Adalind ruined their lives when Renard started the whole mess in the first place that eventually led to all the things that happened to Juliette. Juliette had no problem sharing Renards bed, yet Nick is supposedly committing a terrible crime against her for simply stoping her from killing his child in Adalinds womb.
Henry, I tried, I really tried to have an intelligent conversation, all I got back is the same old same old circle jerk. Now it is claimed there is the ability to read the mind of a fictional character on how Nick couldn't possibly have believed to:
Quote:Nick *never* considered the situation grave, or he would have told Wu to call for backup and then had Wu assist him.
WTF does that mean. WTF does it have to do with taking WHAT side? There was NO SIDE TO TAKE. I guess now its being deflected to if there was no grave danger. As predicted, the argument is skewed to a different argument. Typical politician response when confronted with factual reality and no way to prove their point. 3 to 4 flocking pages of stuff and it was never mentioned "Nick *never* considered the situation grave".
If Adalind was never in any grave danger than what did Nick do wrong? How did he take her side if she wasn't in any danger? How did he prevent what WAS NOT going to happen while taking her side?
The only reasoning I can come up with is that my insanity isn't as far gone as bad as some others.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!