04-19-2018, 03:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2018, 03:16 PM by dicappatore.)
(04-19-2018, 10:53 AM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:By Nick steeping in between Juliette and Adalind, he was able to accomplish 3 things.
1st, he was protecting his unborn child.
2nd he was protecting Adalind
3rd and this is the biggie you, syscrash and Robyn seem to overlook, he was protecting Juliette for getting arrested again and maybe without bail this time since it would be a second offense, while out on bail, before she even went in front of a judge for her bar brawl.
You are missing one big thing. Juliette did not need to be anywhere near Adalind to do something to her. AS we saw at the spice shop. Juliette could have had Nick pull his gun and shot Adalind. Since she did not touch anybody and it was Nick who pulled the trigger. Exactly what would they charge her with. Nick would be the one in jail for murder. So your logic makes no since. Like Juliette said at the time she only wanted to see what Nick would do. She wanted to see who's side he was on.
The only "BIG THING" I am missed "what could have happened, what should have happened, if this had happened or the possibility of other happenings.
Here is the "BIG THING" that "DID HAPPEN"
By Nick steeping in between Juliette and Adalind, he was able to accomplish these things.
1st, he was protecting his unborn child.
2nd he was protecting Adalind
3rd and this is the biggie you, syscrash and Robyn seem to overlook, he was protecting Juliette for getting arrested again and maybe without bail this time since it would be a second offense, while out on bail, before she even went in front of a judge for her bar brawl.
Do you see the different "BIG THING" between us? I missed out on what could have been, you missed out on what actually happened. Ok, so we can put this argument to rest. NEXT!
(04-19-2018, 10:53 AM)syscrash Wrote: The first thing is from a personal position I myself do not consider any of the characters actions as cheating and I stated why. My statement where in support of why one could make the argument for their being cheating. Understand the difference when you say I am saying something. The other thing. You are trying to make a correlation not even made. I never said anything about Nick not kissing her or sleeping on the couch.
Just because they are not together does not mean Juliette would not be pissed because Nick is with the women that caused her to become a hexenbiest.
Below is your post from 4/15/2018: Look at your last TWO sentences. Read it to yourself. Focus, then read it again.
"So using a lose definition of the subject. Nick was the first to cheat."
Even leaving it with its context, you just contradicted yourself. Now we can put an end "THIS" discussion too.
(04-15-2018, 06:40 PM)syscrash Wrote: When Adalind and Sean where in the woods, and Sean was suffering from the compulsion spell. Adalind told him to show her what he could never show Juliette. Did Adalind woge back we do not know for sure.But Rachael told Sean to woge and she woged back . rosalee woged and Monroe woged back. It would not be unbelievable that Adalind woge back. As for Kenneth. Considering The King , and Eric both enjoyed hexenbiest and found them beautiful. I do not see why Kenneth would not be the same.
Below isHere is another point. Nick had Adalind pinned to the ground while she was in full woge. That was when he acted like he was going to kiss her and she bit his lip after un woging. He was not repulsed by Adalinds woge. Even when Nick was proving it was him during the transformation. Nick referred to it as their first kiss. Which is interesting because Nick and Juliette where still together then. So using a lose definition of the subject. Nick was the first to cheat.
I hate to sound like a broken record, but you should read what you write. Your 'writers intent" doesn't match up with the writer.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!