12-13-2015, 06:16 AM
(12-12-2015, 11:21 PM)Karai9 Wrote: With all the little tidbits that's been revealed and the fact that the writers are doing there damndest to make sure we don't think that Adalind has forgotten Diana but at the same time never let them actually be reunited. I got to thinking. While rewatching some episodes in season 3 when Adalind was trying so hard to sell off her child. The scene where The gypsy Queen Stefania made her sign the contract in blood stood out to me. We know blood contracts are supposed to be the sort of thing you can break out of and we know Stefania was working for Victor. I suspect that the contract is still in effect. Working in some sort of mystical way to make sure Diana is always out of Adalind's reach. Incidentally she ends up with the royals anyway. I kind of felt sorry for Adalind knowing what it's like to love a child irrationally and was thinking that she never catches a break and that might be why.Some posts have put the contract into play but I don't anyone used the contract as a problem with getting Diana back. Some have said the the Gypsy Queen broke the contract first by going to Viktor could that be so?
Your thoughts?
In this episode talking to Trubel Diana did come up and losing her as being the worst day of her life. We do have to remember her and Nick think the royals have her and likely she is in Europe. Putting pressure on her and Nick wouldn't help and Adalind knows that so I'm not upset that she hasn't done it, in fact I think it shows Adalind in a better light taking care of Kelly and not crying over something she could see a way of happening.
Now I think when Trubel that HW have Diana then Meisner asks Nick for help wait and see does Nick use that request to get Diana for Adalind? Meisner by then may also think well of Nick and do it. This also would bring Nick and Adalind together,
What do you see happening with this good idea bad idea or so so?