(11-24-2017, 03:54 PM)irukandji Wrote: New Guy, be frank all you want. I would also add that you need to be honest with yourself. For example, if you were as "illuminating" as you think you are, you would have proved without a doubt, the evidence you state you have against Juliette long ago. Instead, what I find is a lot of conjecture and speculation. Conjecture and speculation you equate to fact. You yourself (as specified in post #350), added the timeless acronym, "IMO". Your "facts" are nothing of the kind. They are simply, "your opinion".The thing that is closed is your mind. You cannot cannot accept facts. No need to mention the other posters who see you as incompetent. Lacking any facts, your opinions are futile and your insults only add to your failings.
You had the temerity to accuse me of not answering your posts, but I noticed that you took no time to answer my post #382 (which carefully responded to every question you posed). Tsk, tsk. You need to pay attention and take heed to the advice you often dish out to others.
I found the lackluster response that you attempted cowardly and tediously flat. You were the one who indicated an interest in debating. Yet you chicken out. I suppose it's due to the fact that anyone (without a lot of effort) can smash your arguments to pieces.
I think we've said our piece. From my end, this debate is closed, but I can guarantee you won't leave it that way.
You must provide facts in a debate. You must provide facts to prove your case in court. You completely fail at debate.
My fact based arguments are irrefutable without facts to the contrary. You have never produced any facts to the contrary.
You have dug a deep hole and fallen in. Your baseless insults will not save you. Accepting the truth is your only possible redemption.
There is no "smashing" of facts. There is only understanding of the facts and applying reason to achieve truth.
You have not presented any evidence to disprove the facts I have given. Your responses are only evidence of your personal bias and hatred. The have no basis in the actual Grimm show.
Your statement:
Quote:Your "facts" are nothing of the kind. They are simply, "your opinion".is quite revealing.
Prove for us that Juliette was not, bailed out by Kenneth. That is a fact I have presented. Disprove it or accept it and see how it affects proof she was an accomplice. If you cannot then just pitch another hissy fit and throw more insults.
You are such a sore LOSER!
N G