01-30-2018, 06:53 AM
(01-30-2018, 06:25 AM)New Guy Wrote:(01-29-2018, 02:41 PM)irukandji Wrote:Hi Iruk,(01-29-2018, 02:30 PM)eric Wrote: No. You have still not given a single name of someone he killed rather than try to arrest. He did not hunt wessen, he left innocent ones alone, he tried to arrest the guilty, only killing those who he could not arrest. He arrested the bank robbers, even tho,as they said, they couldn't be convicted. He tried arrest first not killing first. Would you prefer he just let everyone get away to kill again?
Why would I? That wasn't my point. My point was that I wanted to see Nick do more research on his own. Whether or not you agree, 50+ killings is a lot to me. It should be a lot to a grimm who wants to be a different kind of grimm. He should be looking at himself and his methods and determining how he can bring even the rotten wesen to justice. Whether or not you agree, they are entitled to justice, not a bullet from Nick's gun.
Can you reply to Eric's statement?
Quote:You have still not given a single name of someone he killed rather than try to arrest.If Nick primarily used deadly force only in compliance with police procedure then why not just say so?
Eric provided evidence to support his position but you only reply:
Quote:Why would I?You should provide evidence or concede.
N G
Because there is no such evidence. Even Kenneth was given a fair chance. He was brought to an empty warehouse. His handcuffs removed. He had the chance to run away or drop on his knees and ask for forgiveness, even if he only left the mansion to try to kill Nick, after he just got done killing his mom.
Instead, his Royal smugness started to ridicule Nick, then proceeded to attack him. Nick responded by protecting himself and proceeded to kill him. Was that unfair? I say no. That's the best I can come up with. If some viewers were offended? BOO-HOO. Go cry me a flocking river, then drown in it!
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!