09-14-2016, 05:40 PM
(09-14-2016, 02:51 PM)izzy Wrote: I think we are viewing this in different contexts. My context is from a man who is new to Adalind and evaluating her in terms of a relationship. That is a very different perspective than Nick view of her, Renard's view of her etc...
We may be. But I’m not sure why Adalind would need to explain or justify those specifics to any future man in her life. If she did for some reason, it would be simple enough to admit she foolishly deluded herself into believing there was a future with Renard and she had sex with Nick as part of a scheme to get her daughter back after he kidnapped her.
If we will always be judged by our worst sin/crime and there is no redemption, what’s the point of the sentencing phase of a trial or the pursuit of a better life? This woman can never be anything more because she has two children by two different men? This woman is immoral because of her sexual activity or because her children were fathered by immoral men?
I don’t understand the absoluteness of Adalind’s limited options or why she should accept that what she has now is the most she will ever deserve.
(09-14-2016, 03:18 PM)syscrash Wrote: Then Adalind is also guilty of felonies. The attempted murder of Mari. The poisoning of Juliette. the poisoning of Hank. Invading and assaulting Juliette in her house. conspiracy in the murder of Frau Pech. The selling of her child. conspiracy in the plan the ended in Kelly death. Remember Juliette may have provided the final piece. But Adalind put the plan in motion, providing all the information about Kelly that caused Kelly to become the target. If not for Adalind they would not have known about Kelly.You see Kelly Burkhardt from a viewer’s perspective and for some reason think Adalind should also. Adalind is a character who’s daughter was kidnapped. Kelly is a character who spearheaded the kidnapping. There isn’t any logical reason for these two characters to understand, respect, or protect one another.
Quote:As for Kelly, even Hank and Sean admitted they are glad they are not the one to have to tell him how he got here.Hank & Renard are glad they don’t have to explain Kelly’s conception? Hank’s having this moral high ground exchange with the man who coerced Adalind to complete the spell that would kill him. Maybe they should explain to Kelly how Renard almost had Hank killed because he wanted a key. Or maybe they should explain to Kelly the only reason he exists is they helped his father & grandmother kidnap his sister when she was a baby.
(09-14-2016, 04:33 PM)Renardfan99 Wrote: Adalind knew Renard was not in love with her and based on the scene between her and her mother, she was fine with hanging around the man and doing his dirty work. Here's the thing, Adalind is/was an adult and she could have walked away from Renard when he wanted her to keep trying to kill Marie, but she CHOSE to continue holding onto a man that clearly was not IN love with her.Agree Adalind is responsible for her decisions/actions. What I don’t understand is characters and fans seeing Adalind as evil while dismissing that Renard orchestrated or jumpstarted much of Adalind’s acts against Team Grimm.
"If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well." Rainer Maria Rilke