Time after time people keep wanting to argue as if the characters where making the choice. Every argument ignores any an all narrative. The arguments even interject the idea of what they should have known. I will try and explain it again. Grimm is a scripted show under complete control of the writers. If the writers have Juliette say she did not know. Then that is what the writers want the viewers to believe. This idea of arguing why that is not true, makes no sense. You can argue the logistic of something. But you can not argue the point of view.
People keep wanting to argue the motivation for what a character does. The writers do not go that deep into establishing that kind of insight to the character. All actions and response have one go. That goal is to point the story in a certain direction. That is why many of the action and response do not make sense if viewed from a realistic point of view.
Take Henery of Green post. The view is though you are evaluating an actual event. Try evaluating it as the writers wrote it. Consider actually what happen and not the assumptions. When ambiguity exist listen to the narrative and the prologue. That is how the writers state their intent.
Now lets consider what the writers actually showed. The writers exposed Adalind to Kenneth intent by killing Sean's spy. The writers also let us know that Adalind understood the ramifications of going against Kenneth by having her go to Nick out of fear. By listing to the dialog and watching what the writers showed. We saw Juliette was portrayed as not able to kill Adalind. It was also shown the Adalind believed that Juliette was trying to kill her. WE then hear Kenneth threaten Adalind with Juliette. The writers then provide us with proof that the threat was true by having Juliette burn the trailer after talking to Kenneth. Now lets examine that action. The main reason they burnt the trailer was for technical reasons. The writers use Juliette as a women scorned as a reason. Trying to apply the subtext people try to do as to who was write or wrong is not even addressed by the writers. The whole act of how Adalind got pregnant in the first place. The writers have the characters show they hold no ill will to how it went down. this is not because the writer want you to feel a certain way about the character. They are trying to establish a point of view about the event. Had it been about the character, they would have had they characters express an opinion.
Lets take Kelly death. You never hear Nick say Juliette killed his mother. At most he says she set her up. To counter that they writers absolve Juliette, and make Nick statement as viewed from that characters point of view. The writers absolve Juliette by never showing are having dialog that provides her with direct or indirect knowledge of what was in store. Then to clear up any ambiguity about what Juliette did. They provided narrative saying she did not know. This statement goes along with the writers not giving her any direct knowledge.
The writers then do a redemption statement where she expresses regret. The writers even push the point to show Juliette forcing Nick to kill her. Because the writers need the character, they provide and intervention and create a bridge to transition from Juliette to Eve. In later episodes the writers provide narrative stating that Trubel was not trying to kill Juliette. Again this was meant to clear up any ambiguity.
People keep wanting to argue the motivation for what a character does. The writers do not go that deep into establishing that kind of insight to the character. All actions and response have one go. That goal is to point the story in a certain direction. That is why many of the action and response do not make sense if viewed from a realistic point of view.
Take Henery of Green post. The view is though you are evaluating an actual event. Try evaluating it as the writers wrote it. Consider actually what happen and not the assumptions. When ambiguity exist listen to the narrative and the prologue. That is how the writers state their intent.
Now lets consider what the writers actually showed. The writers exposed Adalind to Kenneth intent by killing Sean's spy. The writers also let us know that Adalind understood the ramifications of going against Kenneth by having her go to Nick out of fear. By listing to the dialog and watching what the writers showed. We saw Juliette was portrayed as not able to kill Adalind. It was also shown the Adalind believed that Juliette was trying to kill her. WE then hear Kenneth threaten Adalind with Juliette. The writers then provide us with proof that the threat was true by having Juliette burn the trailer after talking to Kenneth. Now lets examine that action. The main reason they burnt the trailer was for technical reasons. The writers use Juliette as a women scorned as a reason. Trying to apply the subtext people try to do as to who was write or wrong is not even addressed by the writers. The whole act of how Adalind got pregnant in the first place. The writers have the characters show they hold no ill will to how it went down. this is not because the writer want you to feel a certain way about the character. They are trying to establish a point of view about the event. Had it been about the character, they would have had they characters express an opinion.
Lets take Kelly death. You never hear Nick say Juliette killed his mother. At most he says she set her up. To counter that they writers absolve Juliette, and make Nick statement as viewed from that characters point of view. The writers absolve Juliette by never showing are having dialog that provides her with direct or indirect knowledge of what was in store. Then to clear up any ambiguity about what Juliette did. They provided narrative saying she did not know. This statement goes along with the writers not giving her any direct knowledge.
The writers then do a redemption statement where she expresses regret. The writers even push the point to show Juliette forcing Nick to kill her. Because the writers need the character, they provide and intervention and create a bridge to transition from Juliette to Eve. In later episodes the writers provide narrative stating that Trubel was not trying to kill Juliette. Again this was meant to clear up any ambiguity.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one